JUDGMENT :

BIREN VAISHNAV, J.

1. These appeals have been filed challenging the orders of the learned Single Judge in the respective appeals.

2. In Letters Patent Appeal No.147 of 2017, the order under challenge of the learned Single Judge is dated 30.10.2015. Since an application for review was filed challenging the order dated 30.10.2015 which was rejected by oral judgment dated 18.07.2016, Letters Patent Appeal No.148 of 2017 has been filed against the order rejecting the review.

3. For the purposes of this judgment, facts in Letters Patent Appeal No.148 of 2017 are considered.

4. This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent has been filed by the appellant who was the original petitioner before the learned Single Judge. The appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 18.07.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Review Application in the Special Civil Application No.5999 of 2002.

5. Facts in brief are that the appellant was the original petitioner who approached the learned Single Judge challenging the penalty order dated 28.06.2001 and the appellate order dated 24.10.2001 which confirmed the order of penalty passed by the respon