Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Ranjitsinh Natvarsinh Dabhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present petition, under Articles 14, 16, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged order/decision dated 19/06-07/2016 terminating the service of the petitioner and prayed inter-alia that:-
(b) Such other and further reliefs as are deemed fit in facts and circumstances of this case may kindly be granted.
(c) To provide cost of this petition.”
2. The brief facts giving rise to present petition are that the present petitioner was serving in the Police Department as Armed Lok Rakshak since 19/10/2006 with full honesty, sincerely. The present petitioner served with the Chargesheet on 30/08/2013 for unauthorized abs
Judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited; courts cannot reassess evidence or interfere unless findings are arbitrary or unsupported by evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of interference in disciplinary proceedings, emphasizing the need for evidence-based findings and the principles of proportionali....
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in disciplinary inquiries, asserting that findings must be supported by adequate evidence and fair procedures.
The main legal point established in the given judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary inquiries and the principles of proportionality and the Wednesbury rule.
Judicial review of disciplinary actions is limited; courts cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their judgment unless findings are arbitrary or unsupported by evidence.
The court cannot interfere in the findings recorded by the authority while exercising the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Doctrine of proportionality in the context of im....
The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings.
Judicial review of disciplinary actions is limited; courts do not interfere unless findings are perverse or punishment is shockingly disproportionate.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
