SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 487

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Divyesh A. Joshi, J.
Arvind Khimabhai Parmar & Ors. – Applicants
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Anr. – Respondents
R/Criminal Misc. Application No. 4684 of 2017 (For Quashing & Set Aside FIR/Order)
Decided On : 18-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Chintan S Popat
For the Respondent: Mr. Keyur A Vyas, Mr. Dhawan Jayswal APP

In abetment of suicide cases, clear evidence of mens rea and active involvement is required; mere allegations without proof of cruelty are insufficient for conviction.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306, 498A, 323, and 114 - Quashing of FIR - Applicants sought to quash FIR for alleged abetment of suicide and cruelty - Original accused acquitted after trial - No evidence of mental or physical harassment against applicants - Continuation of proceedings deemed futile. (Paras 2, 5, 11, 24, 25)

(B) Abetment of Suicide - Requirements for establishing abetment under Section 306 IPC - Clear mens rea and active role required - Mere allegations without evidence insufficient for conviction. (Paras 16, 20, 21)

(C) Legal Principles - Court must assess evidence carefully in abetment cases - Presumption under Section 113A of Evidence Act is discretionary and requires proof of cruelty. (Paras 12, 13, 19)

Facts of the case:
The FIR was lodged after the complainant's sister committed suicide, alleging mental and physical torture by her husband and relatives. The applicants, being relatives, claimed no involvement and highlighted the acquittal of the original accused.

Findings of Court:
The court found no evidence against the applicants and deemed the FIR frivolous.

Issues: Whether the FIR against the applicants constituted a valid case of abetment of suicide.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without evidence of cruelty or harassment, the FIR could not stand, and the acquittal of the original accused further supported this.

Result: The FIR was quashed and all proceedings terminated.

JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Learned APP Mr. Dhawan Jayswal for respondent no.1 – State of Gujarat and learned advocate, Mr. Keyur Vyas for the respondent no.2 waive service of notice of Rule.

2. By way of present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed for quashing and setting aside First Information Report being C.R. No.I- 3/2017 registered with Madhavpur Police Station, Porbandar for the offences under Sections 306, 498A, 323 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code qua the applicants.

3. The gist of the FIR is as under,

The sister of the complainant viz., Rupiben married with one Khimabhai Murubhai Parmar (i.e. the original accused no.1) before 35 years and out of said wedlock, they have been blessed with three sons and two daughters, however when the said Rupiben used to come at her parental home, she complained about the ill-treatment at the hands of the original accused no.1 but at that time, after persuading her, she was returned back to her matrimonial house, however on 01.12.2016, the complainant received call from one Jaysukhbhai, wherein he has informed that his sister, Rupiben has committed suicide by setting herself ablaze and the dead body is taken to Government Hospital, Porbandar for performing postmortem and thus, FIR has been lodged against the accused persons alleging inter alia that the accused have meted out mental and physical torture to the deceased and because of which, the deceased has committed suicide.

4. Heard learned advocate, Mr. Chintan Popat for the applicants, learned APP Mr. Dhavan Jayswal for the respondent no.1 and learned advocate, Mr. Keyur Vyas for the respondent no.2.

5. Learned advocate, Mr. Chintan Popat submitted that the impugned FIR has been filed against total 5 accused persons for the alleged offences, wherein the applicants are shown as accused nos.2 to 5. Learned advocate submitted that the applicant nos.1 and 3 are the son of the deceased, whereas the applicant nos.2 and 4 are the wife of the applicant nos.1 and 3 respectively and the original accused no.1 is the husband of the deceased. Learned advocate read over the allegations leveled in the impugned FIR and submitted that bare perusal of the contents of the FIR clearly goes on to show that essentially the allegations were leveled against the original accused no.1, who has not approached this Court for quashing of the impugned FIR. Learned advocate submitted that immediately after the registration of the impugned FIR, the applicants have approached this Court for quashment of the impugned FIR, wherein this Court while issuing notice vide order dated 20.02.2017, protected the applicants by passing an order of no coercive steps. Learned advocate submitted that thereafter, the investigation was carried out and on conclusion of the same, the chargesheet came to be filed against the original accused no.1 and, thereafter, trial against him was concluded before the court concerned and at the end of trial, the original accused no.1 has been acquitted from the charges leveled against him, copy of said order has been placed on record by way of filing an additional affidavit. Learned advocate has taken this Court through the findings given and conclusion arrived at by the learned Judge while passing an order of acquittal and submitted that the learned Judge has considered and appreciated all the evidence available on record. Learned advocate submitted that in the operative part of the order, the learned Judge has made discussion in detail so far as the depositions of witnesses are concerned. It is found out from the record that the original complainant is passed away during the course of proceedings and, therefore, his deposition could not be recorded but rest of the witnesses are examined by the prosecution witnesses but not a single witness has deposed against the applicants and on the contrary, they have deposed in a very categorical terms specifically stating that there was no physical and mental

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top