SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 624

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
C2R Projects LLP – Petitioner
Versus
Kinetix Solutions Private Limited and Others – Respondents
Petition Under Arbitration Act No. 24 of 2024
Decided On : 03-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Parth.
For the Respondent: Shrijit G. Pillai.

The expiration of an arbitrator's mandate due to statutory limits precludes the appointment of a substitute arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act, 1996.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11 and Section 15(2) - Dispute resolution - Petition for appointment of co-arbitrator dismissed as the mandate of the arbitrator had already expired due to the lapse of statutory time limits - The court emphasized that the appointment of a substitute arbitrator must follow the original arbitration agreement's provisions. (Paras 6, 11, 19)

(B) Arbitration proceedings - The court clarified that the withdrawal of the arbitrator does not equate to termination of the mandate if the mandate had already expired by operation of law. (Paras 10, 17)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought the appointment of a co-arbitrator after the sole arbitrator withdrew from the proceedings, claiming that the mandate had terminated due to the expiration of the statutory timeline for arbitration.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the mandate of the arbitrator had indeed expired, and thus, the petition for appointing a co-arbitrator was not maintainable under Section 15(2).

Issues: The main issues were whether the arbitrator's withdrawal constituted a termination of the mandate and the appropriate procedure for appointing a substitute arbitrator.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the provisions of the arbitration agreement must be followed for appointing a substitute arbitrator, and the expiration of the mandate was due to statutory limits rather than the arbitrator's withdrawal.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

1. The instant petition has been filed with the prayer to appoint a co-arbitrator on behalf of the respondent in respect of the arbitration proceedings between the petitioner and the respondent.

2. Brief facts relevant to decide the controversy at hands are that the petitioner and Respondent No. 1-Company are privity to a share purchase and Share Subscription Agreement (SPA) and Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 03.06.2015. Clause 11.10 of the Share Purchase Agreement pari materia to Clause 18.12 of the Share Holders Agreement governs dispute resolution and reads as under:

    “11.10 Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

    (a) If any dispute arises between the Investors on the one hand any or all of the Company, Promoter Group on the other hand during the subsistence of the Transaction Documents or thereafter, in connection with or arising out of the validity, interpretation, implementation or alleged breach of any provision of the Transaction Documents or regarding a question, including the question as to whether the termination of any of the Transaction Documents by any Party has been legitimate, the disputing Parties shall endeavour to settle such dispute amicably, and the same shall in the first instant be resolved through mediation by reputed lawyers, 1 (One) each appointed by the Investors and the Promoter Group. The attempt to bring about an amicable settlement is considered to have failed as soon as one of the disputing Parties, after reasonable attempts, which attempt shall continue for not less than 30 (Thirty) days, gives 15 (Fifteen) days' notice thereof to the other disputing Parties in writing.

    (b) In case of such failure, the dispute shall be referred to a sole arbitrator to be mutually appointed by the Promoters Group, the Company and the Investor within 5 (Five) days from the expiry of the said 15 (Fifteen) days' notice or in case of disagreement as to the appointment of the sole arbitrator, to 3 (Three) arbitrators, the Investor nominating one arbitrator and the Promoter Group appointing the second arbitrator where the dispute is between the Investors and the Promoters and where the dispute is between the Investors on the one hand and the Promoters and the Company on the other hand, the second arbitrator shall be appointed jointly by the Promoters and the Company, who shall both be appointed within 15 (Fifteen) days from the expiry of the said 5 (Five) days' period. The third arbitrator shall be appointed by the 2 (Two) arbitrators so appointed within 15 (Fifteen) days of their appointment. The arbitration proceedings shall be governed by the (Indian) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    (c) The place of arbitration shall be Ahmedabad, India.

    (d) The proceedings of arbitration shall be in the English Language.

    (e) The arbitrator's award shall be substantiated in writing. The arbitral tribunal shall also decide on the costs of the arbitration proceedings.

    (f) The award shall be binding on the Parties subject to the applicable Laws in force and the award shall be enforceable in any competent court of law.

    (g) The award shall be concluded within 120 (One Hundred and Twenty) days of the date of reference of the dispute to arbitration.

    (h) This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the Laws of India and subject to the provisions of arbitration as set out above, the courts at Ahmedabad, India will have exclusive jurisdiction.

    (i) For avoidance of doubt it is clarified that nothing in this Clause 11.10 shall apply to disputes inter se between the Company and the Promoter Group.”

    (Emphasis supplied)

3. On a dispute between the parties, a notice dated 21.09.2020 was sent by the petitioner invoking arbitration/dispute resolution clause as per the dispute resolution clause, nominating a mediator and calling upon the respondents to appoint their nominee mediator within 15 days, in order to proceed with the mediation in respect of the disputes arising out of the aforesaid agreement. The notice also stipulat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top