Back
GITA GOPI
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vithalbhai Bhimjibhai Radadiya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GITA GOPI, J.
1. Both the appeals have been jointly heard, since they arise out of a common judgment in MACP Nos. 188 of 2004 and 190 of 2004 delivered on 08.04.2008 by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Amreli.
2. Though served, none appeared on behalf of the respondents.
3. The Insurance Company challenges the judgment inter-alia on the ground that the judgment and award is contrary to law and erroneous, and when the Tribunal has arrived at a conclusion that the appellant insured driver was not negligent for causing the accident in question, and has not been found as a tortfeasor, the Insurance Company would not be liable to pay the compensation, and merely considering claimants being passengers travelling in the insured rickshaw, the Tribunal has laid down joint and several liability of all the opponents.
4. Learned advocate Mr. Maulik Shelat submitted that the Tribunal has very categorically answered the issue no. 1, which was raised, as to whether claimants prove that the drivers of passenger Rickshaw No. GJ-14-T-2337 and Bullet Motorcycle No. GJ-4-AA-5050 involved in the accident, were rash and negligent in driving their respective motor vehicles. Referring to the f
The main legal point established is that in cases of motor accidents, the concept of composite negligence and the liability of wrongdoers play a crucial role in determining the party responsible for ....
In the case of composite negligence, the plaintiff/claimant is entitled to recover the entire compensation from any one of the joint tort feasors, and apportionment of compensation between two tort f....
In cases of composite negligence, the injured party can recover full damages from any one of the negligent parties, and the liability of joint tortfeasors is joint and several, irrespective of the ex....
In the absence of proof of tortious act by the driver of the auto, the owner/insured cannot be held vicariously liable.
A vehicle's overload does not equate to contributory negligence without direct evidence linking it to the accident. Liability can be wholly assigned based on the principle of primary negligence.
The claimant has the right to sue both or any one of the joint tortfeasors to recover the entire compensation in cases of composite negligence, and apportionment of compensation between two tortfeaso....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of insurers in cases of negligent driving and the apportionment of compensation in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Passengers are not vicariously liable for a driver's negligence; compensation cannot be reduced based on the driver's fault in a composite negligence scenario.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
