Back
SANDEEP N. BHATT
Deceased Haseenabibi Sariyakhan Patahn Through Lhr. Mohammed Farooz Sariyakhan – Appellant
Versus
Estate Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Both these second appeals are filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’ for short) by the original plaintiff. Second Appeal No.257 of 2023 is arising from Regular Civil Appeal No.31 of 2004 arising from Regular Civil Suit No.186 of 1993, whereas Second Appeal No.258 of 2023 is arising from Regular Civil Appeal No.30 of 2004 arising from Regular Civil Suit No.266 of 1996. The common order passed in both the Regular Civil Suits dated 1.5.2004 by the learned Second Joint Civil Judge, Ahmedabad Rural and the common order passed in both the Regular Civil Appeals dated 20.4.2023 passed by the learned First Appellate Court i.e. 8th Additional District Court, Ahmedabad Rural are challenged by way of these second appeals, by raising the following substantial questions of law:
2. The Appellant being the monthly tenant without termination of the tenancy under section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act whether such summary proceedings under the Public Premises Eviction Act could be resorted by the
The plaintiff's failure to comply with lease terms and obtain necessary clearances and sanctions rendered the suits unsustainable.
Tenancy rights cannot be terminated without due process under the Transfer of Property Act, and eviction must follow legal requirements.
A tenant inducted by a mortgagee loses tenancy rights upon mortgage redemption, absent a direct contract with the mortgagor.
A second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure must involve substantial questions of law, and unregistered tenancy agreements cannot establish non-evictable rights.
The court affirmed that a lease is terminated by efflux of time and issuance of quit notices, leading to unauthorized possession by the tenant, with no substantial question of law for appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principle of estoppel against tenants or lessees in possession, as embodied in Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, which....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
