Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Gobarbhai Bhimbhai Gohil – Appellant
Versus
District Development Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present group of petitions, the petitioners have challenged inaction on the part of the respondents seeking following relief/s:-
2. In Special Civil Application Nos. 10552, 10553, 10555, 10556 and 10557 of 2016, the petitioners have prayed for below mentioned relief/s:-
(b) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue the writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction of this Hon'ble Court and be pleased to direct the respondent numbers 1, 2, and 4 to revise the pay of the petitioner with all the consequential benefits as per the relevant notifications and resolutions of the state government.
(c) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to iss
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of temporary employees to wages at the minimum of the pay-scale extended to regular employees holding the same post, based on the p....
Petitioners are entitled for minimum time scale of pay and they are bound to serve during regular office hours of an employee on par with regular employees of the same cadre. Therefore, the petitione....
Temporary and contractual employees cannot claim regularization based solely on long service without following established recruitment procedures as mandated by the Constitution.
An employee engaged in same work cannot be paid less than another who performs the same duties and responsibilities such an action is demeaning, strikes at the very foundation of human dignity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
