SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 2266

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
M. Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Amrith Raj
For the Respondent: Ch. Satish

ORDER :

1. Heard Sri K.Amrith Raj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Ch.Satish, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3.

2. The petitioners approached this Court seeking the prayer as under:

“….to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not implementing G.O.Rt.No.121 Revenue (Endowment-1)Department, dated 09.03.2018, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, void and consequently, to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners with reference to their length of service and seniority in the light of the provisions contained in G.O.Rt.No.121 dated 09.03.2018 and grant the arrears of pay attached to the posts held by the petitioners including the annual grade increments as and when fell due from time to time in accordance to G.O.Rt.No.577 dated 15.09.2017 and to pass.”

3. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the petitioners have been working as daily wage employees in Sri Gnana Saraswati Devasthanam, B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top