N. V. ANJARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI
Deepa Ramswaroop Saraswat – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Schools – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRANAV TRIVEDI, J.
Letters Patent Appeal No. 708 of 2022 was heard on 05.02.2024, whereas Letters Patent Appeal No. 711 of 2022 was heard on 06.02.2024. However, both these Letters Patent Appeals have common issue of law, therefore they are taken up together for deciding the issue.
2. Both these Letters Patent Appeals under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.04.2022 of learned Single Judge whereby the Special Civil Applications came to be dismissed rejecting the prayer made in the petitions.
2.1 The appellants - original petitioners prayed before learned Single Judge to declare that the action on the part of the respondents in not offering appointment to the petitioners in the Government Secondary School at Bhavnagar as Secondary Teacher was illegal.
2.2 It was next prayed to declare that the action on the part of the respondents was to appoint meritorious candidates than the petitioners on the post in question, which was unjustified.
2.3 The third limb of the prayer was to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners as Teacher from 01.07.2017 and to pay her all the consequential service benefits.
3. Insofar as Letters Pate
Chandigarh Administration through Director of Public Instructions (Colleges)
J. Ranga Swamy v. Government of Andhra Pradesh [(1990) 1 SCC 288]
The foundational degree and medium of instruction are crucial in acquiring expertise to teach in the same medium, and the requirement for candidates to have studied in the same medium as the school's....
The main legal point established is that for the appointment of a teacher in a specific subject, a specialized degree in that subject, not a subsidiary one, is required as per the advertisement stipu....
Employment and Service matter - Post of contractual Hindi Teacher - Petitioner has got the basic qualification and training qualification along with B.Ed. from Jammu University, his application shoul....
Point of law: Merely, because another view or a better view is possible, there should be no interference with or disturbance of the order passed by the Single Judge, unless both sides agree for a fai....
There is no equivalent Rule akin to Rule 10(a)(ii). A perusal of the said Rule 10(a)(ii) clearly presupposes and provides that the acquisition of a higher qualification would presuppose the acquisiti....
State authorities have broad discretion to set educational qualifications for public service positions, and courts will not interfere unless there are statutory violations.
Point of law: The word “equivalent” must be given a reasonable meaning. By using the expression “equivalent” one means that there are some degrees of flexibility of adjustment which do not lower the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.