SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Chaitali Sadhu, W/o. Santosh Kumar Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant intra-court appeal preferred under Clause-10 of Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 12.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.1621 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, while dismissing the writ petition, the learned Single Judge has refused to interfere with the objection raised by the respondent no.4 vide letter no.1588 dated 08.07.2019 regarding the appointment of Graduate Trained Teachers on the ground that the writ petitioner has not been found to be eligible to hold the post as per the terms and conditions stipulated in the advertisement.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading made in the writ petition, required to be enumerated, are as hereunder:-
3. It is the case of the writ petitioner that an advertisement being Advertisement No.21/2016 was floated by the respondent-Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission for conducting the Combined Graduate Trained Teacher Competitive Exam-2016 for appointment to the post of Graduate Trained Teacher. In pursuant to the same, th
State of Orissa Vs. Mamata Mohanty
Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors. vs. Kamini and Ors.
Bedanga Talukdar Vs. Saifudaullah Khan & Ors.
The Sole Trustee Loka Shikshana Trust v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mysore
Frank Anthony Public School Employees' Association v. Union of India & Ors.
Osmania University Teachers' Association v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.