SUNITA AGARWAL, PRANAV TRIVEDI
RAJESH CHINUBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
NIRMALKUNJ COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 02.05.2024 passed by the learned single Judge allowing a writ petition filed by the Co-operative Housing Society, which has decided for re-development as contemplated under the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act 1973’). While allowing the writ petition, the learned single Judge has directed the private respondents 6 to 9 to vacate their respective flats falling within the jurisdiction of the petitioner Co-operative Society and handover the peaceful and vacant possession thereof for re-development as per the aforesaid provisions within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order and further to co-operate in the re-development of the petitioner No. -1 society. Out of four respondents against whom the direction has been issued by the learned single Judge, three are before us in the instant appeal.
2. Challenging this order, the learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently submitted that no mandamus can be issued against the private persons, as the private respondents before the writ court-the appellants herein, are not performing any public law functio
Binny Ltd. and Another vs. V. Sadasivan and Others
Mani Subrat Jain and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Gurnam Kaur
VST Industrices Ltd. vs. VST Industries Workers’ Union and Another
A co-operative society's decision for redevelopment, supported by majority consent, is binding on all members, and individual objections cannot impede the process if statutory conditions are satisfie....
Members of a cooperative society must adhere to the society's decisions and bylaws, losing individual rights in favor of collective governance.
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment project under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, based on the majority consent of the members, dilapidated condition of the build....
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
A cooperative society can proceed with redevelopment if 75% of members consent, prioritizing safety and majority decisions over individual objections.
1. Substantial compliance with statutory provisions for redevelopment of a building is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the law.
2. A writ court has the jurisdiction to issue a writ of ma....
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
Non-cooperative members of a co-operative society are bound by redevelopment decisions made by the majority, and courts can exercise powers under Section 9 to direct them to vacate premises for redev....
The public interest in the redevelopment scheme and the lack of infringement of the petitioners' fundamental or legal rights were the main legal points established in the judgment.
Society - Process of re-development of its building - Plaintiff has neither made out a prima-facie case nor could show as to how redevelopment, would cause loss to him nor could establish, re-develop....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.