JUDGMENT :

Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.

1. Mr. Bharat T. Rao, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner No.1- Society seeks permission to delete the present respondent no.5. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The Registry is directed to delete the respondent no.5.

2. By way of the Civil Application (for Direction) No.1 of 2024 in the present petition, Mr. Bharat T. Rao, learned advocate prays that the present petitioner no.2 to be transposed as respondent no.6 in the main petition. This Court by even dated order, i.e. on 30.08.2024, allowed the said Civil Application.

3. Heard Mr. Bharat T. Rao, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner-society, Ms. Pooja Ashar, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 3– State, Ms. Ritu R. Guru, learned advocate appearing for the respondent no.2 – Corporation, Mr. Kamlesh B. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the private respondent no.4 and Mr. Daxay Patel, learned advocate appearing for the private respondent no.6 – M/s. Suryam Developers (transposed from petitioner no.2).

4. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Petition reads thus:

4.1. The petitioner herein is a registered cooperative society