SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1629

GITA GOPI
AAKASH KALUBHAI VASKALE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : KUMAR H. TRIVEDI, RAJENDRA R. CHAVDA.
For the Respondent: HARDIK MEHTA.

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. The present revision application has been filed by the applicant-revisionist under section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection of Children) Act, 2015, (hereinafter referred to as ‘J.J. Act’ for short), making a prayer for regular bail to the applicant, who was aged about 17 years at the time of alleged act.

3. The FIR was registered before the Junagadh Taluka Police Station as C.R. No. 11203025240006 of 2024 for the offences punishable under sections 376(3), 376(2) of IPC and sections 5(j)(2), 5(L), 5(N), 6, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘POCSO Act’).

4. The father of the juvenile in conflict with law had moved the principal Magistrate of Juvenile Justice Board of Junagadh by filing Criminal Misc. Application No. 251 of 2024, where by an order dated 23.02.2024, the application came to be rejected, thus thereafter moved the Children Court by filing Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 2024. The legality and propriety of the order is under challenge before this Court in the present revision applicati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top