NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI
Juvenile X – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Narendra Kumar Johari, J.
1. The instant Revision has been filed on behalf of Revisionist-Juvenile through his father/natural guardian against the order dated 19.01.2022 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Session Judge, Fatehpur in Criminal Appeal No.53 of 2021 (Juvenile through natural guardian father Vs. State of U.P.) and order dated 17.09.2021 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Fatehpur in Case No.111/2020, arising out of Case Crime No.489/2020, under Sections 376-A, B, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station-Bindki, District -Fatehpur.
2. The record indicates that notice has sufficiently been served on opposite party No.2 but none is present on behalf of the opposite party No.2.
3. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
4. The facts of the case in brief are that on 18.11.2020 when the minor daughter of informant had gone for grazing the goats the revisionist/juvenile penetrated his finger in her vagina which caused pain to the victim consequently she started weeping and crying. Hearing the alarm of victim, the witness Khushi reached on the spot, then after that the revisionist b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.