Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Himmatsinh Chhagansinh Chauhan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant – State of Gujarat (original complainant) under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 04/09/2012 passed by the learned Special Judge & 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”) in Special (Elec.) Case No.46 of 2009, whereby, the learned Trial Judge has acquitted the original accused respondent herein for the offence punishable under Section 135(1)(A) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (for short “the Act”).
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are as under :
2.1 The complainant Dy. Engineer, Shri Jitendrasinh Laxmansinh Rathod, Uttar Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd., Dist. Sabarkantha lodged a complaint against respondent before, UGVCL (GEB) Police Station, Sabarmati for the alleged offence under Section 135(1)(A) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. According to complainant, it is the case of prosecution that on 27/01/2006, inspection was carried out at the premises of respondent accused situated at village Dhunavada, Taluka Modasa, Dist. Sabarkantha and during inspection it
The prosecution must provide sufficient evidence and independent witnesses to establish guilt in theft of electricity cases; mere allegations are insufficient for conviction.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to establish the respondent's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The appellate court must respect acquittals unless substantial evidence of error or illegality is demonstrated, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
In appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should only intervene when there is compelling evidence of error in the trial's findings, reaffirming the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court must uphold an acquittal unless there is clear evidence of illegality or error in the trial court's judgment; it cannot reverse an acquittal merely on the possibility of a differe....
The appellate court's jurisdiction under Section 378 allows reappreciation of evidence, but it cannot overturn an acquittal if two reasonable conclusions are possible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of acquittal, the appellate court should be slow to interfere with the trial court's findings, especially when two views are possible....
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, and appellate courts should respect trial court acquittals unless a manifest error is evident.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
