Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MANSUKHBHAI VIRJIBHAI VEKARIYA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant-State of Gujarat under Section 378 (1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30.3.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court, Rajkot (hereinafter referred to as “the trial Court”) in Sessions (G.E.B.) Case No. 6 of 2004, whereby, the trial Court has acquitted the original accused-respondents herein for the offence punishable under Sections 135 (B) and 150 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (“the Act” for short).
2. It is the case of the complainant that accused No. 1 possessed one factory and for which he made an application before for G.E.B. LTP III connection. After getting sanction from G.E.B. he bought LTP III meter himself and by tempering meter to run it slow, committed a mischief and by helping to do so, accused no. 2 has also committed an offence punishable under Sections 135 (B) and 150 of the Act. Therefore, complaint came to be filed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2.1 On the basis of the said complaint, after thorough investigation, as there was sufficient evidence against the present responde
The appellate court must respect acquittals unless substantial evidence of error or illegality is demonstrated, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The prosecution must provide sufficient evidence and independent witnesses to establish guilt in theft of electricity cases; mere allegations are insufficient for conviction.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to establish the respondent's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The appellate court's jurisdiction under Section 378 allows reappreciation of evidence, but it cannot overturn an acquittal if two reasonable conclusions are possible.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so results in acquittal.
The appellate court must uphold an acquittal unless there is clear evidence of illegality or error in the trial court's judgment; it cannot reverse an acquittal merely on the possibility of a differe....
In appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should only intervene when there is compelling evidence of error in the trial's findings, reaffirming the presumption of innocence.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, and appellate courts should respect trial court acquittals unless a manifest error is evident.
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft of electricity, and the appellate court is reluctant to overturn acquittals without clear evidence of illegality.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
