Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Firozbhai Pirbhai Belim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J.
1. The State of Gujarat has preferred present Appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr. P.C. for short) against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 16.2.2012 passed by the learned Special Judge (GEB) and Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar (hereinafter be referred to as “the trial Court”) in Special (GEB) Case No. 136 of 2005 whereby the original accused was acquitted from the charges levelled against him under Section 135(1)(A) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003.
2. It is the case of the appellant-State that on 14.05.2004, Jr. Engineer of the P.G.V.C.L, Shri J.J. Gohil along with Shri.Y.R. Jadeja had carried out inspection at the premises of the respondent-accused. During inspection, it was observed that the respondent-accused had illegally committed theft of electricity for an amount of Rs.46,692.45 therefore, supplementary bill of Rs.46,692.45 was prepared and issued to respondent-accused, which was not paid by him within stipulated time.
2.1 Accordingly, complaint being C.R.No. II- 500/2004 was lodged before G.E.B. Police Station, Bhavnagar for the alleged theft of electricity under Section 135 (1) (A) of the Indi
The appellate court's jurisdiction under Section 378 allows reappreciation of evidence, but it cannot overturn an acquittal if two reasonable conclusions are possible.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to establish the respondent's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must provide sufficient evidence and independent witnesses to establish guilt in theft of electricity cases; mere allegations are insufficient for conviction.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, and appellate courts should respect trial court acquittals unless a manifest error is evident.
The appellate court must respect acquittals unless substantial evidence of error or illegality is demonstrated, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court must uphold an acquittal unless there is clear evidence of illegality or error in the trial court's judgment; it cannot reverse an acquittal merely on the possibility of a differe....
In appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should only intervene when there is compelling evidence of error in the trial's findings, reaffirming the presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence and the principles for appellate courts to review evidence in appeals against acquittal were central to the judgment.
Where the trial court allows itself to be beset with fanciful doubts, rejects creditworthy evidence for slender reasons and takes a view of evidence which is but barely possible, it is obvious duty o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
