SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1982

NIRZAR S. DESAI
Mahendra Jamnadas Parekh – Appellant
Versus
Gujarat Maritime Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms Dhruvi K Desai, Ms Harshal N Pandya
For the Respondent: Ms Sejal K Mandavia

JUDGMENT :

NIRZAR S. DESAI, J.

1. With the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, this matter is taken-up for final hearing and disposal, today. Hence, RULE. Learned Advocate, Ms. Mandavia, waives service for the Respondents.

2. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction to the Respondent-authorities to recalculate their retiral benefits, including pension, from the date of their initial appointment and not from the date of their regularization in service, with a further direction to the Respondents to pay the arrears and grant the benefits to the petitioners along with interest, at the rate, which, this may Court deem fit, in the facts of this case.

3. The brief facts, leading to the filing of this petition, and as canvassed by learned Advocate, Ms. Dhruvi Desai, appearing for learned Advocate, Ms. Pandya, for the petitioners are as under;

All the petitioners came to be appointed by the Respondent-authorities, initially, as daily-wagers on different posts and on different dates, between the years 1984-1985, and the details whereof are produced vide a chart produced as Annexure-A to this petition, which reads thus;

Sr. No.

Name

Date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top