SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIRZAR S. DESAI, J.
Bhartiben Nandkishor Dave – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 16626 Of 2022
Decided On : 17-12-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:MR. G.M. JOSHI, SENIOR ADVOCATE with VYOM H. SHAH.
For the Respondents: MS. NIRALI SARDA, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court emphasized the principle of parity in treatment for similarly situated individuals, directing the authorities to grant benefits under government resolutions.

Headnote:

(A) Government Resolution dated 08.02.2008 - Government Resolution dated 04.12.2009 - Petition for fixation of pay and granting revised selection grade - Petitioner, a retired librarian, claims benefits under resolutions for selection grade pay after serving 35 years - Court directs authorities to consider eligibility and grant benefits within three months. (Paras 11, 12)

(B) Delay in petition - Respondent's argument of delay rejected as no substantial difference in facts from similarly situated cases. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:

The petitioner retired as a librarian and sought pay fixation and selection grade benefits under specific government resolutions, claiming similar treatment as granted to other librarians. (Paras 4.1, 4.2)

Findings of Court:

The court found that the petitioner is similarly situated to others who received benefits and directed the authorities to grant these benefits within a specified timeframe. (Paras 11, 12)

Issues: The main questions were whether the petitioner is entitled to the same benefits as other similarly situated librarians and if the delay in filing the petition affects her claim. (Paras 7, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the principle of parity in treatment for similarly situated individuals and directed the authorities to act on the petitioner's claim as per the government resolutions. (Paras 11, 12)

Result: Petition allowed; direction issued for consideration of benefits.

JUDGMENT :

(NIRZAR S. DESAI, J.)

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Mehul Sharma for learned advocate Mr. Vyom Shah for the petitioner and learned AGP Ms. Nirali Sarda for the respondent – State.

2. With the consent of the parties, the matter was taken up finally. Hence, RULE returnable;e forthwith. Learned AGP Ms. Nirali Sarda waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State.

3. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to fix pay of the petitioner who has completed five years in the selection grade on 01.01.1996 at the stage of Rs. 14,940/- in the pay scale of Rs. 12,000/- – 18,300/- in accordance with Government Resolution dated 08.02.2008 issued by the Education Department and further prayed for granting the revised Selection Grade of Rs. 37,000/- – 67,000/- with Academic Grade Pay of Rs. 9000/- with effect from 01.01.2006 as per the Government Resolution issued by the Education Department dated 04.12.2009 with all the consequential benefits including arrears of pay and allowances and revision of pensionary benefits and other retirement benefits of the petitioner who has already retired and therefore, to pay the arrears of pensionary benefits flowing from such directions with interest.

4. The brief facts of the case as canvassed by learned Senior Advocate Mr. G. M. Joshi assisted by learned advocate Mr. Mehul Sharma are as under:-

4.1. That the petitioner was appointed in service on 15.07.1972 and retired on 31.03.2007 after serving for 35 years as Librarian at Nursing College, Civil Hospital College and B. J. Medical College.

4.2. It is case of the petitioner that the college in which she was working was affiliated to B. J. Medical College in the State of Gujarat. It is case of the petitioner that pursuant to the recommendation of the UGC, the Education Department of the State revised the pay scale of Librarians working under Colleges/Universities in the State of Gujarat on completion of 8 years of their service and thereafter on completion of 16 years of service. The petitioner being Medical Librarians were also granted such benefits and selection grade w.e.f. 01.01.1996. Thereafter, the Education Department under Government Resolution dated 08.02.2008 provided that the Librarians working under Colleges/Universities of the State Government are entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 10000-15200 and senior scale of Rs.12000-18000 towards the selection grade at 6 and 11 years instead of 8 and 16 years and the Librarians who have completed 5 years are eligible for selection grade w.e.f 01.01.1996. It was also provided that their pay should be fixed at Rs.14,940/- in the pay scale of Rs.12000-18000. One more resolution was passed dated 11.11.2009 giving the higher pay scale of Rs.15600-39100 from 01.01.2006 to the Librarians working with the State Government. It is the case of the petitioner that since many Librarians of Medical and Dental College were granted revised pay scale of Rs.15600-39100 w.e.f. 01.01.2006, however denied the selection grade of Rs.37000-67000 as per Schedule ‘A’ of Government Resolution dated 08.02.2008 and 04.12.2009, she preferred the petition before this Court for her non-grant of selection grade.

4.3. This Court vide order dated 19.02.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No. 7297 of 2014 in case of Rajeshri Pravin Khatri and Others V/s. State of Gujarat and Others granted the benefit under Government Resolutions dated 08.02.2008 and 04.12.2009 to the petitioners therein. It is the case of the petitioner that she is similarly situated to the petitioners of Special Civil Application No. 7297 of 2014, despite that she has been denied the said benefits. Hence, the present petition is filed.

5. It was also pointed out by learned advocate Mr. Sharma for the petitioner that thereafter one more similarly situated person namely Sureshbhai Keshurbhai Patel approached this Court seeking similar benefits by filing Special Civil Applicat

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top