Back
J. C. DOSHI
Prernaben @ Purviben Mansukhlal Mehta DECD. Thr' heirs – Appellant
Versus
Daudkhan Usmankhan Belim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(J.C. Doshi, J.)
1. These are claimants’ appeal filed u/s 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short “the Act”).
2. Since batch of First Appeals arises out of the common judgment and award passed for same road accident, with the consent of learned advocates for the parties, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
3. Present batch of first appeals are filed by the appellants – claimants challenging common judgment and award dated 9.12.2005 passed by the MACT, Surendranagar in MACP Nos.36/1998 to 40/1998.
4. Brief facts of the case are as under:-
4.1. On 8.6.1997 at 5:30 p.m. in the evening, the injured claimants and the deceased were travelling in Ambassador bearing registration No.GJ 3U 1144 driven by deceased Yunusbhai and when reached near Rajkot, truck No.GJ 9 T 6294 while overtaking one Bus, dashed with the Ambassador, as a result, some of the persons have received serious injuries and some have died.
4.2. Legal representative of deceased Preranaben and Chandanben have filed claim petition Nos.36 of 1998 and 38 of 1998 respectively.
4.3. Injured claimants Harshadbhai Mehta, Mansukhlal Mehta and Yogeshkumar Mehta have filed claim petition No.37
The court clarified that legal representatives under the Motor Vehicles Act include siblings and others, and emphasized the need for proper assessment of income and future prospects in compensation c....
Legal representatives under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act are not limited to spouse, parent, and children, but also include brothers and other dependents.
Legal representatives can claim compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act regardless of dependency status, emphasizing a broader interpretation of dependency in joint family contexts.
Legal representatives, including married daughters and major sons, are entitled to claim compensation under the M.V. Act, emphasizing a broad interpretation of dependency and representation.
Compensation for vehicular accidents must be just and reasonable, focusing on equitable loss recovery, while applying correct legal principles without succumbing to strict technicalities.
Legal representatives can claim compensation for loss to estate under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, even if not dependents.
To maintain a claim petition it is sufficient for the claimant to establish that there is loss of dependency and every legal representative who suffers on account of death of a person in a motor vehi....
The main legal point established is the entitlement of legal representatives to claim compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, irrespective of dependency.
The court determined contributory negligence of both drivers and the claimant's lack of dependency on the deceased, influencing the compensation awarded.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
