SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2036

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
AJAY LALBHAI VADNAGARA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MEGHA CHITALIYA
For the Respondent: DHARA M. SHAH

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.

1. Present appeal is filed by the State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the impugned judgment and order dated 03.08.2011 passed by the learned Special Judge and 7th Additional Sessions Judge, 7th Additional District Court, Junagadh (hereinafter referred to as “the trial Court”) in Special (Electricity) Case No. 8 of 2005 whereby the trial Court has acquitted the respondents-accused from the charges levelled against them.

2. Brief facts of the present case, in nutshell, are as under:

    2.1 It is the case of the prosecution that on 20.05.2004, the officers of the Gujarat Vij Company Shri Arifbhai Abdulbhai Ghanchi, Junior Engineer and others have carried out inspection at the premises of the accused and they found illegal electricity connection and, therefore, the accused had committed theft of electricity energy respectively. It is alleged that all the accused have jointly by suing the water motor committed theft of 3730 watts amounting to Rs.1,30,186.92 totaling to Rs.3,45,326.50 and, therefore, the supplementary bill of Rs.3,45,326.50 was issued in favour of the accused, which was not paid by them within stipulated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top