SUNITA AGARWAL, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Arjanbhai Lakhabhai Baraiya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought against illegal dispossession of land. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. claims of forgery in revenue records affecting acquisition. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal framework governing land acquisition proceedings. (Para 8 , 10 , 20) |
| 4. completion of acquisition process despite claims of forgery. (Para 24 , 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. By means of present petition, the petitioners seek following relief:
Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal & Ors. [(2020) 8 SCC 129]
Ram Charan Singh vs. Savitri Devi [(2003) 8 SCC 319]
Ram Preeti Yadav vs. U.P. Board of H.S. and Intermediate Education [(2003) 8 SCC 311
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs. Jagananth [(1994) 1 SCC 1]
State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Ravindra Kumar Sharma & Ors. [(2016) 4 SCC 791]
The land acquisition process is valid despite claims of forgery in records without prior objections raised during the process.
The court emphasized that land acquisition must follow due process, and failure to do so renders the acquisition invalid, protecting the property rights of individuals.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.