SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 1308

SANGEETA K. VISHEN
Bhavin Jaigovind Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr Mitul K. Shelat With Mr DM Devnani.
For the Respondent: Mr J.K. Shah, AGP.

JUDGMENT :

(Sangeeta K. Vishen, J.)

With the consent of learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2. Issue rule, returnable forthwith. Mr J.K. Shah, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for the respondents.

3. The petitioner, is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in placing the motor vehicle, bearing registration no.MH-02-EE-0999 (hereinafter referred to as “the vehicle”) in the ‘black list’. The petitioner has also prayed for direction to the respondents to issue no use certificate in respect of the no objection certificate (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NOC’) issued by the Motor Vehicles Department, Maharashtra. The petitioner has also prayed for refund of Rs.9,53,497/- levied and collected by the respondent from the petitioner; however, Mr Mitul K. Shelat, learned advocate with Mr Dharmesh M. Devnani, learned advocate for the petitioner, does not press the said prayer.

4. Briefly stated are the facts.

4.1 The vehicle, was sold by ACE PERKINS (Asset Cars Pvt. Ltd.) to M/s Marshal Vinimay Private Limited under the tax invoice dated 29.03.2016 and it was registered with Maharashtra Ro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top