HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J
GAUTAM LAKHMANBHAI KARETHA – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE AHMEDABAD – Respondent
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2672 of 2025
(A) Passport Act, 1967 - Section 6 - Notification dated 25.08.1993 - Denial of passport issuance due to pending criminal proceedings - The Passport Authority must adhere to the provisions outlined in the notification, which exempts citizens with pending criminal cases from certain restrictions, provided they have court permission. (Paras 4-5)
(B) Public interest - The notification serves to balance individual rights and public interest by allowing citizens facing criminal proceedings to travel abroad under specific conditions. (Para 4)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought issuance of a passport which was denied due to ongoing criminal proceedings against him. The respondent authority based its decision on the notification dated 25.08.1993.
Findings of Court:
The Passport Authority is directed to process the application for a passport with a validity of five years in accordance with the notification.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner could be issued a passport despite pending criminal proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized adherence to the notification, stating that the Passport Authority must consider the public interest while processing applications for passports of individuals with pending criminal cases.
Result: Petition disposed of with directions to the Passport Authority.
ORDER :
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. It is submitted that due to pendency of criminal proceedings against the petitioner, the respondent authority has denied to issue the passport to the petitioner.
3. Mr. Pradip Bhate, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Passport Authority submits that the case of the petitioner will be governed by the notification/circular dated
25.08.1993 and the application would be decided accordingly.
4. In view of the pendency of the case, it is pertinent to take note of the notification/circular dated 25.8.1993 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, providing that in the interest of public at large, the citizens, be exempted, against whom the proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by them are pending before the Criminal Court. The relevant extracts of the notification dated 25.8.1993, read as under:
"In exercise of the process conferred by clause (a) of Section 22 of the Passport Act, 1967 (15 of 1967) and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs No. G.S.R 298 (E) dated the 14th April, 1976, the Central Government, being of the opinion that it is necessary in public interest to do so, hereby exempts citizens of India against whom proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by them are pending before a criminal court in India and who produce orders from the court concerned permitting them to depart from India, from the operation of the provisions of Clause (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the said Act, subject to the following conditions, namely:-
(a) the passport to be issued to every such citizen shall be issued –
(i) for the period specified in order of the court referred to above, if the court specifies a period for which the passport has to be issued; or (ii) if no period either for the issue of the passport or for the travel abroad is specified in such order, the passport shall be issued for a period of one year;
(iii) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period less than one year, but does not specify the period validity of the passport, the passport shall be issued for one year; or
(iv) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period exceeding one year, and does not specify the validity of the passport, then the passport shall be issued for the period of travel abroad specified in the order.
(b) any passport issued in terms of (a)(ii) and (a) (iii) above can be further renewal for one year at a time, provided the applicant has not travelled abroad for the period sanctioned by the court; and provided further that in the meantime the order of the court is not cancelled or modified;
(c) any passport issued in terms of (a) (i) above can be further renewed only on the basis of a fresh court order specifying a further period of validity of the passport or specifying a period of travel abroad;
(d) the said citizen shall give an undertaking in writing to the passport issuisng authority that he shall, if required by the court concerned, appear before it at any time during the continuance to force of the passport so issued."
5. In view of the above, the respondent Passport Authority is directed to decide the application of the petitioner for issuance of passport with a validity period of five years in terms of the notification/circular dated 25.8.1993.
6. Needless to say that the exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order.
7. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Direct service is permitted.
The Passport Authority must issue a passport to individuals with pending criminal cases if permitted by the court, as per the 1993 notification.
The court ruled that citizens with pending criminal cases may obtain passports under specific conditions outlined in the 1993 notification, balancing individual rights and public interest.
The authority to permit travel abroad for individuals facing criminal charges lies solely with the Trial Court, as established by the Passports Act and clarified through GSR Notification 570(E).
The court affirmed that a passport can be issued to individuals with pending criminal cases, provided they meet the conditions outlined in the 1993 notification.
The court affirmed the right to apply for a passport despite pending criminal proceedings if a No Objection Certificate from the court is provided, emphasizing the necessity of judicial oversight ove....
The restriction in Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967 is not absolute and may be relaxed by court order for individuals with pending criminal cases, as per the notification dated 25.08.1993.
The court clarified the application of Section 6(2) of the Passports Act and the notification dated 28.06.1993, emphasizing the eligibility for a passport post-conviction and the necessity for specif....
The passport authorities must renew passports for a period of 10 years, while travel permissions during pending criminal proceedings must be obtained from the Trial Court.
Point of law: Since in cases where time is not fixed by the Magistrate while granting permission, the Passport authorities are issuing passports only for one year, the period for which the accused ca....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.