SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J.
Atma Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM-M No. 67964 of 2025
Decided On : 03-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sandeep Goyat
For the Respondent: Vasundhara Dalal Anand

The court affirmed the right to apply for a passport despite pending criminal proceedings if a No Objection Certificate from the court is provided, emphasizing the necessity of judicial oversight over travel applications.

Headnote:(A) Passport Act, 1967 - Sections 6 and 22 - Quashing of rejection for passport application under NDPS Act - The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the appellant’s request due to pending criminal proceedings - The court emphasized that under Section 22, exemption is granted for applicants with pending criminal cases if the court permits travel. The applicant was allowed to apply for a passport while subject to conditions, specifically needing judicial permission to travel abroad (Paras 1, 10, and 11).

(B) Notification dated 25.08.1993 - Authority's discretion in granting passports - An applicant may be permitted to obtain a passport despite pending criminal cases if an order from the court allowing it is produced (Paras 8 and 11).

Table of Content
1. filing for passport application quashed due to legal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's arguments regarding passport application and daughter's studies. (Para 3 , 4)
3. explanation of relevant provisions of the passport act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. precedent case allowing similar passport application. (Para 9)
5. court's authority to grant permission for passport application despite pending proceedings. (Para 10)
6. petition granted, order quashed allowing passport application submission. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J.

1. Present petition has been instituted under Section 528 of BNNS, 2023 for quashing order dated 04.11.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Judge, Fast Track under NDPS Act, Fatehabad in case titled as State Vs. Atma Ram in FIR No.82 dated 27.02.2020, under Section 15 /61/85 of NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Sadar, Fatehabad whereby permission to apply and obtained the passport from the concerned authority was rejected and further directed the ld. Trial Court to grant the permission to the petitioner for apply and obtain the passport.

2. Now, the petition in hand has been instituted seeking permission to apply for passport before the passport authority.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that present petition has been filed seeking permission of this Court to apply for issuance of a passport. In view of office memorandum dated 10.10.2019 by the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs PSP Division regarding issuance of passports to the persons against whom criminal cases are pending. Infact, the petitioner’s daughter namely Priyanka is studying abroad in the University at Buffalo in the State of New York, United State of America. However, in view of order dated 18.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, Fatehabad his request for the issuance of passport was declined.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel have been heard and material collected by the police during investigation has been perused.

5. It would be necessary to examine the relevant provisions of the PASSPORT ACT , to decide the present application. Section 6 of the PASSPORT ACT , 1967 held as under:-

“6. Refusal of passports, travel documents. etc.—

(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to make an endorsement for visiting any country under clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 5 on any one or more of the following grounds, and on no other ground, namely:—

(a) that the applicant may, or is likely to, engage in such country in activities prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India;

(b) that the presence of the applicant in such country may, or is likely to, be detrimental to the security of India;

(c) that the presence of the applicant in such country may, or is likely to, prejudice the friendly relations of India with that or any other country;

(d) that in the opinion of the Central Government the presence of the applicant in such country is not in the public interest.

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any foreign country under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 5 on any one or more of the following grounds, and on no other ground, namely:—

(a) that the applicant is not a citizen of India;

(b) that the applicant may, or is likely to, engage outside India in activities prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India;

(c) that the departure of the applicant from India may, or is likely to, be detrimental to the security of India;

(d) that the presence of the applicant outside India may, or is likely to, prejudice the friendly relations of India with any foreign country;

(e) that the applicant has, at any time during the period of five years immediately preceding the date of his application, been convicted by a court in India for any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top