SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3439 of 2025 ==========================================================
MALIK MOHMED SHOEB SABBIR Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ADILHUSHAIN M SAIYED(9723) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS HETAL PATEL, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 3 MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE Date : 20/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:ADILHUSHAIN M SAIYED(9723) ,Respondent Advocate: MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523)

The court affirmed that a passport can be issued to individuals with pending criminal cases, provided they meet the conditions outlined in the 1993 notification.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 232, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 149 - Gujarat Police Act - Section 135 - Passport issuance - Petitioner sought renewal of passport amidst pending criminal proceedings. The Passport Authority must adhere to the notification dated 25.8.1993, which allows issuance under certain conditions despite ongoing cases. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

(B) Public Interest - The notification aims to balance public interest with individual rights, allowing citizens with pending cases to obtain passports under specified conditions. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner faces a criminal case and seeks passport renewal. The Passport Authority requires a court order for processing.

Findings of Court:
The Passport Authority is directed to issue the passport for five years as per the notification.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioner could renew his passport despite pending criminal charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the Passport Authority to follow the 1993 notification, which permits passport issuance under specific conditions despite ongoing criminal proceedings.

Result: Petition disposed of; Rule made absolute.

ORDER :

(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)

RULE. Learned counsel Mr. Pradip Bhate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.3 waive service of notice of Rule.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It is submitted that against the petitioner, a criminal case being Criminal Case No.13624 of 2022 is pending before the Trial Court at Bharuch for the offences under Sexctions 232, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The petitioner herein has prayed to direct the respondent authorities to renew his passport.

3. Mr. Pradip Bhate, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Passport Authority submits that the case of the petitioner will be governed by the notification/circular dated 25.8.1993 and the application would be decided accordingly.

4. In view of the pendency of the case, the authority has required the petitioner to furnish the Court’s order. In this behalf, it is pertinent to take note of the notification/circular dated 25.8.1993 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, providing that in the interest of public at large, the citizens, be exempted, against whom the proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by them are pending before the Criminal Court. The relevant extracts of the notification dated 25.8.1993, read as under:

"In exercise of the process conferred by clause (a) of Section 22 of the Passport Act, 1967 (15 of 1967) and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs No. G.S.R 298 (E) dated the 14th April, 1976, the Central Government, being of the opinion that it is necessary in public interest to do so, hereby exempts citizens of India against whom proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by them are pending before a criminal court in India and who produce orders from the court concerned permitting them to depart from India, from the operation of the provisions of Clause (f) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the said Act, subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(a) the passport to be issued to every such citizen shall be issued –

(i) for the period specified in order of the court referred to above, if the court specifies a period for which the passport has to be issued; or

(ii) if no period either for the issue of the passport or for the travel abroad is specified in such order, the passport shall be issued for a period of one year;

(iii) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period less than one year, but does not specify the period validity of the passport, the passport shall be issued for one year; or

(iv) if such order gives permission to travel abroad for a period exceeding one year, and does not specify the validity of the passport, then the passport shall be issued for the period of travel abroad specified in the order.

(b) any passport issued in terms of (a)(ii) and (a) (iii) above can be further renewal for one year at a time, provided the applicant has not travelled abroad for the period sanctioned by the court; and provided further that in the meantime the order of the court is not cancelled or modified;

(c) any passport issued in terms of (a) (i) above can be further renewed only on the basis of a fresh court order specifying a further period of validity of the passport or specifying a period of travel abroad;

(d) the said citizen shall give an undertaking in writing to the passport issuisng authority that he shall, if required by the court concerned, appear before it at any time during the continuance to force of the passport so issued."

5. In view of the above, the respondent Passport Authority is directed to decide the application of the petitioner for issuance of passport with a validity period of FIVE YEARS in terms of the notification/circular dated 25.8.1993.

6. Needless to say that the exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of the cop

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top