SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 110

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
ISHWARBHAI RAMESHBHAI VANSFODA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 1213 of 2025



Petitioner Advocates:MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(6929) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - Applicant seeks bail in connection with FIR for contraband liquor - Applicant has good reputation, but has 70 antecedents - Court considers nature of offence and gravity of accusations - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 2, 5, 8, 12)

(B) Bail considerations - Factors include prima facie case, availability of accused at trial, and potential for witness tampering - Court emphasizes that prior observations should not influence trial court's decision. (Paras 7, 11)

Facts of the case:
The Applicant filed for bail under BNSS in connection with a FIR for contraband liquor, asserting good reputation and willingness to comply with conditions. The prosecution highlighted the Applicant's 70 antecedents and previous bail violations.

Findings of Court:
The application for bail is allowed, with the Applicant ordered to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and complying with specified conditions.

Issues: The main issues were the Applicant's antecedents, the nature of the offence, and the likelihood of the Applicant's presence at trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that despite the Applicant's criminal history, the nature of the allegations and the completion of the investigation warranted bail, emphasizing the importance of not influencing the trial court's decision with prima facie observations.

Result: Application for bail granted.

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.

2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11214023241248 of 2024 registered with Kadodara GIDC Police Station. Surat Rural.

3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that there are as many as 70 antecedents against the present applicant for commission of similar nature of offences. She further submitted that learned Sessions Court has observed while dismissing the application of the applicant filed by him that in the other offences wherein the applicant has been ordered to be enlarged on bail, the applicant has not remained present before the concerned trial court, therefore the warrants have been issued against him. In the present offence, if the applicant is ordered on bail, in all probability, the applicant would not be available for the purpose of trial. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and perused the record. From the record it appears that the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. As per the case of prosecution, the stock of contraband liquor had been seized from the premises belonging to the present applicant. Having regard to the nature of the offence and the allegations levelled against the present applicant, the application deserves consideration.

7. This court has considered the following aspects:

(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.

(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.

(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 2.12.2024.

(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

8. Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and perusing the record produced in this case as well as taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of accusation, availability of the Applicant Accused at the time of Trial etc. and the role attributed to the present Applicant accused, the present Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly stands allowed. This Court has also gone through the FIR and police papers and also the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Court where the learned Sessions Judge has disallowed the bail Application at initial stage. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that he shall:

(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.

(c) furnish the documentary proof of complete, correct and p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top