SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1147

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
S.V. PINTO
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Usmangani Abdulgafar Meman – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Bhargav Pandya, Jay J. Jani
For the Respondent: H.D. Chudasama

JUDGMENT :

S.V. PINTO, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 15.10.2007 in Sessions Case No.19 of 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Trial Court’), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents-accused from the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 306 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’). The respondents are hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ as they stood in the rank and file in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.

2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:

2.1. The accused No.1 was the husband, the accused No.2 is the brother-in-law, accused No.3 mother-in-law and accused No.4 is sister-in-law of deceased Hasinaben who was married to the accused No.1 on 14.09.1996. That all the accused used to physically and mentally harass the deceased and on 01.03.2004, as Hasinaben could not bear the torture between 12:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top