SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1150

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
S.V. PINTO
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Nathubhai Rasulbhai Kureshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Bhargav Pandya
For the Respondent: Tejas P. Satta

JUDGMENT :

S.V. PINTO, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 20.11.2007 in Sessions Case No.67 of 2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Judge, Mehsana (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Trial Court’), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents – accused from the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 306 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’). The respondents are hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ as they stood in the rank and file in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.

2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:

2.1. Yasminaben, the daughter of the complainant Dilawarkhan Ramjumiya Sama (Musalman) was married with Idrishbhai Nathubhai Qureshi and the accused Nos.1 and 2 are the father-in-law and the mother-in-law and the accused No.3 is the younger brother-in-law of Yasminaben. The accused used to physically and mentally harass Yasminaben and on 16.02.2007 around 8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top