IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Arjanbhai Premjibhai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 21.09.2007 in Sessions Case No.23 of 2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhangadhra (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Trial Court’), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents – accused from the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 306 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’). The respondents are hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ as they stood in the rank and file in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:
2.1. The accused Nos. 1 and 2 are the brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased Sarojben Mansukhbhai, who was married to the younger brother of the accused No.1 about 7 years prior to the incident that had occurred on 07.06.2004. The accused and Mansukhbhai Premjibhai, the husband of the deceased, had purchased land and constructed a house in Nilkanth Park at villa
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306, clear evidence of instigation or incitement is required, which was not proven in this case.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only interfere if the trial court's judgment is perverse or lacks proper reasoning.
The appellate court upheld the presumption of innocence, emphasizing that an acquittal should not be overturned without compelling evidence demonstrating guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
For abetment of suicide under IPC, clear evidence of instigation or harassment is essential; mere allegations are insufficient.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only interfere if there is clear evidence of illegality or perverse reasoning in the trial court's judg....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for abetment of suicide without clear evidence of instigation.
In appeals against acquittal, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment of suicide.
The court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC Sections 306 and 498-A; clear evidence of instigation is necessary.
Conviction under Section 306 IPC requires proof of direct instigation, conspiracy, or intentional aid in suicide; generalized harassment allegations without proximate acts inciting suicide are insuff....
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only interfere if the trial court's decision is perverse or lacks evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.