SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 56

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
SARANG PANKAJBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS SRUSHTI A THULA(5014) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11201018240004 of 2024 registered with C.I.D Cyber Crime Police Station, Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence. Applicant is not named in the FIR, during the investigation, his name is surfaced. The allegations against the present applicant is that he has given the account to the co-accused on rent and the applicant has transferred Rs. 50,000/- in the account of Vipul Limbachiya and Rs.40,000/- in the account of wife of Tejas Patel, except this no allegation is levelled. It is submitted that there is no money trail. Considering the aforesaid, in his account whatever amount he has received, the said amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top