SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 330

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
VIJAYBHAI MOTIBHAI HARSIDHIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Z L KHAN(7966) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. applicant seeks anticipatory bail (Para 1)
2. applicant claims false involvement (Para 2)
3. state opposes bail (Para 3)
4. court considers bail factors (Para 4)
5. court allows bail application (Para 5)
6. application allowed with conditions (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER :

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11216011240628 of 2024 registered with Infocity Police Station, Gandhinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. He has submitted that the applicant and co-accused have committed fraud with many persons and total duped Rs.92 lacs. The applicant has played active role in this offence and has received money and as investigation is still going on, custodial interrogation is required.

4. Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top