SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 86

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
ARJUN GANGARAM KHILNANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR AMRISH K PANDYA(3219) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11216001240810 of 2024 registered with Adalaj Police Station, District Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Prakash K. Jani assisted by learned advocate Mr. Amrish Pandya for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he has been falsely enroped in the offence. Further, though the applicant is not named in the FIR, his name has surfaced during investigation on the basis of statement of co-accused. There is no allegation worth the name for the offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery and important fact is that the accused Nos.1 and 2 and the complainant have settled the disputed and even the civil suit has been withdrawn unconditionally. Furth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top