SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 91

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PRAVINBHAI KESHARBHAI CHAUDHARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ARJUN M JOSHI(11247) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1.  RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11206073240528 of 2024 registered with Vadnagar Smart Police Station, District Mahesana for the offences punishable under Sections 316(5), 319(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and sections 66-C and 66-D of the Information Technology Act.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence however, now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet is filed. The role attributed to the present applicant is that he used to make phone calls to various customers and lure them with huge and lucrative returns to invest in the scheme given by him and thereby he got transferred huge amount of moneys from the victims and witnesses to the accused of co-accused. It is alleged that the present applicant lured the customers by making temptations of unrealistic profit returns and has received huge amou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top