HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
SANKETBHAI ASHVINBHAI DESAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 4493 of 2025
(A) Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Bail application - The applicant sought regular bail in connection with FIR for various offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act - The court considered factors such as the nature of accusations, severity of punishment, and the applicant's lack of prior antecedents. (Paras 2, 5, 6, 8)
(B) Bail Jurisprudence - The principle that 'bail is a rule and jail is an exception' was emphasized, alongside the importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. (Paras 7, 8)
Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case, with allegations of impersonation and financial misconduct. The charge-sheet was filed, and the applicant claimed innocence, asserting no money trail linked to him.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant had not forged documents, had no prior criminal record, and that co-accused had been released.
Issues: The main issues included the applicant's involvement in the alleged offence and the appropriateness of granting bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's continued detention would amount to pre-trial conviction, thus justifying the grant of bail.
Result: Application for bail allowed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant claims innocence (Para 3) |
| 2. opposition to bail application (Para 4) |
| 3. considerations for granting bail (Para 5) |
| 4. aspects considered by the court (Para 6) |
| 5. principle of bail jurisprudence (Para 7) |
| 6. application for bail allowed (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. bail bond execution (Para 10) |
| 8. observations on evidence (Para 11) |
| 9. rule made absolute (Para 12) |
ORDER :
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNS S”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11191034240154 of 2024 registered with Naranpura Police Station, Ahmedabad City for the o punishable under Sections 340(2), 336(3), 336(2), 319(2), 318(2), 308(2) , 204 and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNS ”) and sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information Technology Act .
3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet is filed. Further, the applicant has not forged any document and has not received any money and no money trail is found in his account. At the time of search, 7 accused including the present applicant were arrested and all of them have been released by the learned Sessions Court and no further investigation qua present applicant is required and therefore, on the ground of parity, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail on the ground that applicant has received money and the accused impersonated themselves as CID officials and this is an offence of digital arrest and in collusion and in connivance of co-accused, cyber fraud has been committed and having received account details from various people and providing same to one chinese gang, many people have been duped and still other accused are on run and yet to be arrested. Therefore, he has requested to dismiss the present application.
5. While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.
6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered:
(1) Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed;
(2) Applicant has not forged any document and has not received any money and no money trail is found in his account;
(3) None of the offence alleged is punishable with life sentence or death penalty and triable by the Court of JMFC;
(4) Applicant is behind the bars since 27.10.2024;
(5) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant;
(6) The applicant is not having any past antecedent;
(7) Similarly situated co-accused are released by the learned Sessions Court
(8) Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take some time.
(9) In the chargesheet, it is mentioned
Rameshbhai Batubhai Dhabi Vs. State of Gujarat
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
The principle that 'bail is a rule and jail is an exception' was upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of bail applications.
Bail is the rule and pre-trial detention is the exception; courts must consider the nature of allegations and personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless substantial risks are present.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when the accused has no prior record and the trial may take time.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.