SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 188

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
THAKOR DIPAKJI GANDAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR PRATIK B BAROT(3711) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1.  RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the  Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023  (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11206075240 of 2024 dated 01.10.2024 registered with Visnagar City Police Station, Mahesana for the offences punishable under Sections  316(5), 319(2), 318(4), 61(2), 2(7) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNS ”) and under Sections 66 (D) of the Information Technology Act.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant  submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in  the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or  discovered as the charge-sheet is already filed. The present   applicant is a caretaker of the house of the accused person Thakor  Sendhaji. The allegations agains the present applicant is that of  luring people through phone call to make investment into the share  market. The role attributed to the applicant is that of a messenger  to receive the money from angadiya and handover to the other  accused persons. It is submitted that the present applicant has not  rece

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top