SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 167

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAJAK @ SOPARI DAWOODBHAI CHAVDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR VIRAT G POPAT(3710) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11202009241437 of 2024 registered with Jamnagar City ‘B’ Division Police Station, Jamnagar, for the offence under Sections 120B, 381, 385, 386, 406, 411, 413, 414, 420, 422, 424, 506 and 506(2) of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and he has nothing to do with the offence. Present applicant is not connected with the Noor Transport and he has not participated in the alleged commission of crime. At the relevant point of time for the commission of offence, he was in the custody. Charge-sheet has been filed. Co-accused are enlarged on bail and therefore, on the ground of parity also, applicant deserves bail. The applicant has been arraigned as an accused in the guise of conspiracy, but he has not extorted money or administered threats. Co-accused have obtained loan from finance company and thereafter, unauthorizedly handed over the present appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top