Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
A.S. SUPEHIA, NISHA M. THAKORE
Radhaben Punabhai Mahakal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. Admit. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shruti Dhurve waives service of admission for and on behalf of respondent no.1, learned advocate Mr.Hardik Karathiya waives service of admission for and on behalf of respondent no.2 and learned advocate Mr. P.C. Chaudhari waives service of admission for and on behalf of respondent no.3. The matter is taken upon for final hearing today.
2. The present appeal emanates from the impugned judgment and order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in the captioned writ petition, whereby, the learned Singe Judge though has recorded findings in favour of the present appellant – original petitioner, has ultimately directed the appellant to make a representation.
3. Learned advocate Mr. Nisarg Jain appearing for the appellant has submitted that the learned Single Judge ought not to have relegated the present appellant to make a representation since the reasoning recorded by the learned Single Judge is in her favour. He has submitted that after the merit list dated 06.08.2019 was prepared, a decision was taken by the Committee on 13.12.2019 not to act upon such merit list in view of the communication dated
Higher educational qualifications do not disqualify candidates for positions requiring lower qualifications, and recruitment must follow established government policies.
The court affirmed that selection for Anganwadi Worker positions must follow established criteria, including local residency and performance in interviews, without bias towards higher qualifications.
The court ruled that the appointment of an Anganwadi Worker must adhere to government guidelines, and challenges to such appointments require timely action and proper standing.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Government Resolution dated 13.12.2005 did not discriminate, and the procedure for promotion was undertaken by two separate establishments....
Proof of educational qualifications may be submitted post-application deadline, and must be considered if submitted prior to final selection; disregard for evidence of qualifications violates princip....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
