SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 235

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Madhu Morya (Ku. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
J.S. Rathore for petitioner;
Ajay Raghuvanshi, Panel Lawyer for respondents No.1 to 4/State;
Shyam Sharma for respondent No.5.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 16.4.2013 passed by Additional Commissioner, Gwalior Division, Gwalior in Case No. 406/2011-12/Appeal, by which the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present petition in short are that the petitioner is a Scheduled Caste candidate and an advertisement was issued for appointment of Anganwadi Worker. The petitioner as well as the respondent No.5 participated in the said recruitment process and by order dated 12.6.2017, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Anganwadi Worker, Anganwadi Centre, Ward No.14/11, Bhitarwar, District Gwalior. The appointment of the petitioner was challenged by respondent No.5 before the Additional Collector, Gwalior. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that at the time of appointment of the petitioner, the policy for appointment on the post of Anganwadi Worker, dated 27.5.2006 was in force, according to which the minimum qualification for recruitment to the post of Anganwadi Worker was Higher Secondary/Inter pass. It was also provided that the candidate belonging to Schedule

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top