Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
CHHOTU GUPTNATH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
M. R. MENGDEY, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11214023241645 of 2024 registered with Kadodara GIDC Police Station. Surat Rural.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned advocate Mr.Dipak D. Prajapati for the original complainant and learned APP for the Respondent – State. Learned advocate on behalf of the original complainant shall file his Vakalatnama in the Registry. The Registry shall accept the same.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The present applicant has been arrested in connection with the present offence on 30.9.2024 and since then the applicant is in custody. He submitted that there was love affair between the present applicant and the prosecutrix and because of the same, the physical relations were established between the two. Now, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and both the families have agreed for marriage of t
The court granted bail considering the amicable settlement and the nature of the allegations, imposing strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of the relationship history and the status of the investigatio....
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's custody duration, the nature of allegations, and the lack of evidence suggesting flight risk or witness tampering.
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, emphasizing the need for a balance between the rights of the accused and the gravity of the allegations, with strict conditions imposed to ensure....
The court granted bail considering the applicant's custody duration, nature of allegations, and lack of flight risk, emphasizing the need for compliance with imposed conditions.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's lack of prior criminal record and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the importance of maintaining law and order during bail condition....
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
