Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
JAYDEEPKUMAR S/O BHIKHAJI SAVJI ASARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant has good reputation (Para 4) |
| 2. prosecution opposed bail (Para 5) |
| 3. investigation and charge-sheet filed (Para 6) |
| 4. consideration of bail factors (Para 7) |
| 5. application allowed (Para 8) |
| 6. conditions for bail granted (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
Leave to amend. The amendment to be carried out immediately.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11209055240526 of 2024 registered with Vijaynagar Police Station. Sabarkantha.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned advocate for the original complainant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has veh
The court granted bail based on the applicant's custody duration, the nature of allegations, and the lack of evidence suggesting flight risk or witness tampering.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of the relationship history and the status of the investigatio....
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail considering the amicable settlement and the nature of the allegations, imposing strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court granted bail based on the nature of allegations in a relationship context, applying principles of discretion and referencing prior judgments.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's prolonged custody and the nature of allegations, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and prevent tampering with evidence.
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
