Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
JAYDEEPKUMAR S/O BHIKHAJI SAVJI ASARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant has good reputation (Para 4) |
| 2. prosecution opposed bail (Para 5) |
| 3. investigation and charge-sheet filed (Para 6) |
| 4. consideration of bail factors (Para 7) |
| 5. application allowed (Para 8) |
| 6. conditions for bail granted (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned advocate for the original complainant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that there is nothing on record to suggest that the prosecutrix was having a love affair with the present applicant and therefore, the relations between the two were not consensual in nature. The medical examination of the prosecutrix prima facie proves the aspect of sexual intercourse with the present applicant. Moreover, the prosecutrix in her statement during the course of investigation as well as in her history given before the Doctor, has categorically stated that she was sexually abused by the present applicant against her will. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the nature and
The court granted bail based on the applicant's custody duration, the nature of allegations, and the lack of evidence suggesting flight risk or witness tampering.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of the relationship history and the status of the investigatio....
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail considering the amicable settlement and the nature of the allegations, imposing strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court granted bail based on the nature of allegations in a relationship context, applying principles of discretion and referencing prior judgments.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's prolonged custody and the nature of allegations, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and prevent tampering with evidence.
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
