SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 133

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
JOSHI HITESH PRAKASHBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR MANISH J PATEL(2131) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

2. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11209017230816 of 2023 registered with Himmatnagar Rural Police Station, Dist. Sabarkantha, for the offences punishable under Sections 465 , 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 65(a) and 65(e) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act .

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has nothing to do with the offence. The applicant has no past antecedent. Based on the statement of the co-accused, he has been arraigned as an accused. The applicant was never went to the place where liquor was loaded nor he knows the accused who was arrested. Prosecution has failed to prove allegation against the applicant. Therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top