SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 160

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
OMDEVSINH HARDEVSINH VALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR VAIBHAV A VYAS(2896) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11198053240546 of 2024 registered with Talaja Police Station, District Bhavnagar for the offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 98(2) and 81 of the Prohibition Act.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and has been implicated on the basis of statement of accused No.1 before the police and even the said statement is obtained by the police agency by applying third degree on accused No.1 for which independent proceeding against the police authority has been initiated by the learned Magistrate. Further, nothing is found from the conscious possession of the present applicant and even he was not present at the scene of offence when the contraband liquor was recovered. Even if the allegation made in the FIR is accepted as it is then also on behalf of prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top