SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 191

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
MUKESHBHAI NATHALAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS TEJAL A VASHI(2704) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.) 

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of him arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11206033250062 /2025 registered with Unjha Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 108 and 54 of the BNS.

[3.0] Learned Senior Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and she is falsely enroped in the offence. It is submitted that the business transactions is with the son of deceased and to come out from the said transactions, the alleged incident took place. The applicant has nothing to do with the deceased. The applicant is falsely implicated in connection with the constructions, the goods were purchased from the present applicant. There was a monetary transactions and to recover the said amount the said cheque was issued and the proceeding under Section 138 came to be initiated by the present applicant. The complaint is filed belatedly. Prima facie, there is no iota o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top