SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1166

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Sujalbhai S/o Pratapbhai Dasabhai Maru – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Denish V. Mavadhiya
For the Respondent: H.K. Patel

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

1.1 By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11203025230799/2023 registered with Junagadh Taluka Police Station, Junagadh for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 307 and 114 of the IPC.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely enroped in the offence. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that present applicant is a college going student. During his study, he was residing in hostel and he came into contact with deceased. After sometime, the engagement of the applicant was fixed with another lady. The allegations against the present applicant is that he has blackmailed the deceased. It is submitted that there is no instigation and incitement on the part of the present applicant. There is a delay in lodgment of FIR. Applicant is ready and willing to join the investigation and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top