SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 257

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAMANJI RAMAJI PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR VISHAL B MEHTA(5319) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat and Mr. Joshi, learned counsel waives Rule for the complainant.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the applicants have prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11209054250015 of 2025 registered with Vadali Police Station, Sabarkantha, for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) , 190 , 118(2), 115(2) , 352 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 135 of G.P. Act .

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicants have nothing to do with the offence. The applicants have no past antecedent. Complaint is filed against 14 accused and one mob of 20 persons. No specific role is attributed to the applicants. The applicants have not caused any injury. There was no any intention to cause any injuries or harm to the victims. Accused went to the place and at that time, one Nagarji had made an assault by knife, who was arrested and enlarged on bail. Nothing is required to be recover

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top