HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
KAIWALYA RITESHBHAI SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 3109 of 2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Anticipatory bail application - Accused sought release on anticipatory bail in connection with FIR for offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 506, and 114 - Applicants claimed they were falsely implicated and had joined the investigation - Opposed by State on grounds of offence gravity - Court emphasized judicial discretion in bail matters, considering factors like nature of accusation and possibility of flight - Cited precedents where courts exercise discretion liberally for punishments of 7 years - Application allowed with conditions for bail. (Paras 1.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0)
ORDER :
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)
RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.
[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the applicants – accused have prayed to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-11206020241284 / 2024 registered with Kadi Police Station, Mehsana for the offences punishable under Sections, 406, 420, 506 and 114 of the IPC.
[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicants have nothing to do with the offence and they are falsely enroped in the offence. Now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicants and pursuant to order passed by this Court, dated 13.02.2025, applicants have joined the investigation. Therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. In view of the above, the applicants may be granted anticipatory bail.
[3.0] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.
[4.0] Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation papers, it is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are (i) the nature and gravity of the accusation; (ii) the antecedents of the applicants including the fact as to whether he has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence; (iii) the possibility of the applicants to flee from justice; and (iv) where the accusation has been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicants by having him so arrested. Though at the stage of granting bail an elaborate examination of evidence and detailed reasons touching the merit of the case, which may prejudice the accused, should be avoided. I have considered the following aspects.
(1) Alleged offence is punishable upto 7 years;
(3) Pursuant to the order dated 13.02.2025, the present applicants have appeared before Investigating Officer and thereafter, he has joined the investigation.
Without further discussing in detail, the present application deserves consideration;
[5.0] This court has also considered the judgment in the case of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022)10 SCC 51 and Md. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and Another reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 892 wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has observe that whenever there is punishment of 7 years, then the court would be liberal to exercise the discretion. Further, by exercising the discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C/under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the doors of remand by the Investigating Officer is open and therefore also this court is inclined to exercise powers under Section 438 of Cr.P.C./under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”).
[6.0] In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of arrest / appearance of the applicants in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-11206020241284 / 2024 registered with Kadi Police Station, Mehsana, the applicants shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount on the following conditions that applicants :
(a) shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation whenever required;
(b) shall remain present at the concerned Po
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the accused joins the investigation and there is no necessity for custodial interrogation, especially for offences punishable up to 7 years.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the applicant demonstrates non-involvement in the offence and willingness to cooperate with the investigation, considering the nature of the charges and absence ....
Anticipatory bail granted based on applicant's cooperation with investigation and absence of prior criminal record, emphasizing judicial discretion in bail matters.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the applicant cooperates with the investigation, has no prior convictions, and the nature of accusations does not necessitate custodial interrogation.
Anticipatory bail granted due to lack of prima facie evidence against the applicant, emphasizing the need for judicious discretion in bail matters.
The court granted anticipatory bail, emphasizing the need for judicious discretion and considering the absence of necessity for custodial interrogation due to seized evidence.
Anticipatory bail granted based on applicant's cooperation in investigation and absence of prior convictions, emphasizing judicial discretion in bail matters.
Anticipatory bail can be granted based on the applicant's circumstances, including the nature of the accusation and the absence of a need for recovery from the applicant.
Anticipatory bail granted considering applicant's cooperation in investigation and absence of need for custodial interrogation.
The court granted anticipatory bail, emphasizing the need for careful discretion in evaluating the nature of accusations and the applicant's background, particularly in commercial disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.