SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 776

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
KAIWALYA RITESHBHAI SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:VALIMOHAMMED PATHAN(6383) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the applicants – accused have prayed to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-11206020241284 / 2024 registered with Kadi Police Station, Mehsana for the offences punishable under Sections, 406, 420, 506 and 114 of the IPC.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicants have nothing to do with the offence and they are falsely enroped in the offence. Now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicants and pursuant to order passed by this Court, dated 13.02.2025, applicants have joined the investigation. Therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. In view of the above, the applicants may be granted anticipatory bail.

[3.0] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top