SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 310

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NSK
GARASIYA KALABHAI BHAGABHAI BHAGORA – Appellant
Versus
DY. COLLECTOR DANTA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ABHIJIT RATHOD(12976) ,Respondent Advocate: GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Abhijit Rathod on behalf of the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Nikunj Kanara on behalf of respondent- State.

2. By way of this petition, the petitioners inter alia challenge order passed by the Deputy Collector, Danta dated 25.10.2024 under an application for condonation of delay in Revision Application No. 4 of 2024 as well as order passed by the Mamlatdar, Amirgadh dated 12.01.2024, in Mamlatdar Court Case No. 3 of 2023.

3. Considering the submission made by learned Advocate Mr. Rathod, while it would appear that the petitioners may have a reasonable cause for approaching the Deputy Collector slightly belatedly, yet, what would be more pertinent to note is that the enactment i.e the Mamlatdar Courts Act does not prescribe any specific time limit for a person aggrieved by the order of the Mamlatdar to prefer a revision application before the Deputy Collector. Again it would appear that the application for condonation of delay was preferred by the petitioners themselves and whereas the Deputy Collector has rejected the said application, coming to a conclusion that there may not be sufficient cause. While the application i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top