SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 379

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
ANURAG @ TIGER SURENDRAKUMAR VARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11191011200007 of 2020 registered with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant had actively participated in commission of the offence in question. The applicant cannot claimed parity with the other co-accused, as the role attributed to the said co-accused, who have been considered for grant of bail is different than the role attributed to the present applicant. He also submits that the trial of the offence is already commenced and is in progress. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and cha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top