SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 381

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
RAGHUBHAI HARIBHAI BHARVAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SP KOTIA(5687) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 46 of 2003 registered with Bagodara Police Station, Ahmedabad.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that earlier, the applicant was enlarged on bail and after being enlarged on bail, the applicant did not remain present before the concerned Trial Court had absconded for longer period, and therefore, there is an apprehension that if the applicant is again ordered to be enlarged on bail, there are all chances that he may not be available for the purpose of trial. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. From the record,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top